Read this: http://www.qlikviewvsolap.blogspot.com/
It stands as a symbol for declining rigor in our beautifull industry. Just copy and paste stuff from SAS website, make comparisons that can never be compared and finally write conclusions that have NOOOOO basis whatsoever.
I am not even waisting my time to explain why this is an abomination......
***edit: join the 'Business Intelligence Group' which is a linkedin Group if you wanna add something to this discussion. It's becoming very interesting since I have - once again - stepped on the toes of a vendor's marketing machine. They are to lazy/cheap to buy some decent advertisment space so they spam these groups. And when critical remarks are made, they get pissed. Any help is appreciated here!!
Also Read
The Reasons Why 69 % Cube Based BI Project Fails And How QlikView Have Success Rate About 98 %
at
http://qlikviewvsolap.blogspot.com/2009/08/reasons-why-69-cube-based-bi-project.html
And please dont cry take your thought to new age to understand QlikView. Abusing any work is not a good idea It will pareciated if you can point out errors and can put your comments.
Posted by: Sudhir | August 20, 2009 at 08:01 PM
Sudhir,
69%??? what research are you refering to? You own? Give me the research paper and I happy to acknowledge your claim.
And if you look at my other posts about the QV chrnonicles, you could see that I was pretty extensive in explaining your faulty thinking....
Posted by: Ronald Damhof | August 20, 2009 at 11:15 PM
Cube and import is one thing, and that's the basis, but when you need to add to it dashboard-instant-modelling and write-back-capability, you need to go further...
www.hicare.com/easy.html
Posted by: Giulio | October 21, 2009 at 02:28 AM